16 Pros and Cons of Monarchy

From Pharaoh of Ancient Egypt circa 3100 BCE to King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, monarchy has prevailed in the nooks of the Earth for millenniums. Associated with hereditary reign, the power and responsibilities are passed on to the descendants by the predecessors after they are deceased, in an ideal monarchial system. 

However, has Monarchy strengthened the ecologic perspective of mankind and the Earth in the yester years, and the days that follow? Let’s have a brief look on the statistics. 

Although, a successful Monarchy can shove the nation towards betterment too. 

Pros of Monarchy

Here are some pros of Monarchy as following: 

A Stable and Consistent government:

Whether it be a constitutional monarchy or an absolute monarchy, the head of state, the monarch enacts a long lasting policies, carefully preserving and safeguarding them until his/her time of serving. Hence, the government proffers a dual support structure wherein the elected government officials manage the legislative, judiciary and executive policies and the monarch, on the other hand, serves as the head of the government proficiently. 

Political Unity:

As the head of the state or Monarch authorizes any policy or legislations to be enacted, the political jeopardy is lesser in the country. The diverse political matters and instabilities are handled by the monarch, if the government fails to do so. This leads to a stronger political unity as the head involves him/herself in the day-to-day matters that are prone to rupture the stability of the government. Hence, from the perspective of the citizens too, the Monarch is the sole guardian of the country, whenever the country faces any trouble or sufferings.   

The greater the Leader, the better the generation:

As the better leadership of a monarch escalates the country’s standard and flourishes a better sustainability in developing overall sectors that are needful throughout the nation, a better monarch is keen on raising standard of his/her livelihood and family too. Hence, his/her successor manifests the pathway that the predecessor walked into, in turn serving his/her life to better the nation and maintain serenity across the country.  

The People’s Hero after Election:

In a monarchial government, the monarch or the ruler is elected by the nation, as per the capability as a successor. Whether the country has an elected Monarch or a hereditary Monarch, the people’s hero is capable to lead the country and the government in a better path, giving a righteous establishment of government in the eyes of the citizens, making them cherished, safe and secure for a better livelihood. 

Lesser corruption, greater possibilities:

The monarchs attain absolute zilch whilst being corruptors, the government and the country at benefit as the monarchs have nothing to gain, or profit from. As they are the lead authorities above the government, they aid in the stability and promotion of a strong international identity in the world, establishing a nationwide sense of cultural identity on the other hand.   

A cost – effective government:

The entire costing to run a governmental election goes high up to 2-4 billion dollars approximate, generally. But, in the case of a monarchial government, the costing of the election is basically lower than that of other governments as the only alterations made are on the behalf of governmental associates, but not the head of the government. Hence, projects that are beneficiary for the development of the country can be funded at ease, in turn sustaining the nation at its best. 

Rapid Implementation of governmental policies:

In a monarchial government, the policies and amendments are taken in action more rapidly than that of other governmental practices. Moreover, the implementation procedures are more concise and accurate, as they are solely based on a unified approach, and the monarch can have a major role in the enactment too, using his/her veto-power at needful times. 

Reserve Powers, and Participation:

A Monarch can take ahold of discretionary reserve powers in order to keep the sub-ordinates of the government fully functioning in a stabilized approach, within the boundaries of the constitution. Therefore, a monarch can have consents to legislations whenever the preferred and required objectives are not met in time. Furthermore, even without an active participation in the functioning of the government, the monarch can serve as royal ambassador or the legislative authorizer, leaving the governmental associates to function at ease, without the active involvement of the monarch at day-to-day affairs. 

Cons of Monarchy

Here are some cons of Monarchy as listed beneath: 

Immature Monarchs, Frail Leadership:

A major drawback of Monarchy, the descendants can be the leaders of the nation if the country goes through untimely demise or absence of the ruling monarch. However, if the successors aren’t adept at handling the crucial and critical matters of the country, the country can undergo developmental crisis and varied risk factors, which may empower the subsidiary government associates to overtake the matters at their hand, without the prior notice to the young emperors.   

Autocracy or Dictatorship:

Another alarming demerits of Monarchy, the ruler can be an autocrat or a dictator, overpowering the nation by his/her own interest, leading to a tyranny. As higher power can provoke an individual to be corrupt and amoral, letting the country go through a constitutional tyranny, at worst cases.  

Local Tax Policies:

The tax-payers of the country shall afford the costings incurred by the Monarch, just like the incurrence to a president or a Prime Minister, as every acts is government- funded. Even after the Monarch leaves the administration, he/she shall be funded by the government in some cases. 

Lack of Independent Justice:

It is not certain the ruling Monarch is a wiser one. As of the fact, the Monarch may over-rule the legislative and judicial matters, as per his/her own personal interest. For instance, if an individual is accused of any crimes or unbearable behaviour that hampers the constitution, the Monarch may pardon him/her at once, or may even sentence them to prison sentence, even death penalty as per the Monarch’s solitary choice. 

Prominence in Discrimination

In a monarchial government, the riches are prone to be associated with power, while the rags are undermined. This can lead to the outrageous behaviour or the socioeconomic community, hampering the voting rights and freedom for election, or even lack of influence for the good prospect. Due to this, the mid-class and the class below poverty line would suffer a serious discrimination in attaining their basic human rights and freedom.

Frail Social Reshaping:

Any kinds of social activities or modifications are passive in a monarchial government.  Only the social changes concerned to the liking of the ruler are progressed, leaving behind the varied crucial changes at shadow. This solely affects the developmental scenario of the nation, as the society is overshadowed by biased judgements, ceasing modernization and enhancement altogether. 

Every Monarch isn’t Virtuous:

Even after the rule of a Monarch with high moral standards, the successor may not be as good as the previous ruler. Hence, the country may go through the constitutional downfall due to the unprofessionalism or amateurism of the elected Monarch. 

No Vote-out from the government

If the elected Monarch is claimed to be a tyrant, he/she cannot be voted out from the power as they are the rule-creators and breakers. Hence, the country could suffer from generational tyranny as the monarchs can elect the members from their own family, as the successors. Furthermore, the citizens aren’t allowed to get rid of the oppressor as they aren’t allowed to vote, comment or initiate revolutionary activities in the favour of the nation. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You May Also Like